IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-new-block: Congestion Control

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 23 October 2020 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7213A100C for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bC2L_NGTsOrS for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE2D33A100A for <core@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9199389A9; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:48:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id WwB7zDCB5Gks; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:48:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C04338991; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:48:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C15570D; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:42:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com
cc: core@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <118201d6a958$5ac8bed0$105a3c70$@jpshallow.com>
References: <118201d6a958$5ac8bed0$105a3c70$@jpshallow.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4019.1603471352.1@localhost>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:42:32 -0400
Message-ID: <4020.1603471352@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/UQifsn0RZnCx4XXUcIlTvkHD_cs>
Subject: Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-new-block: Congestion Control
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:42:36 -0000

If I understood yesterday, it is possible to send a single package asking for
a specific offset of data, and then get 10 packets worth of reply?

Is that correct?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email