Re: [core] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-04: (with COMMENT)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 18 February 2020 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320AA12018B; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:44:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tn1QquBAn-_D; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:44:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23AD0120026; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:44:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.19] (client-141-23-178-142.wlan.tu-berlin.de [141.23.178.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48MMXl26xnz185K; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:44:39 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <158202743151.14138.7139954130434566804.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:44:39 +0100
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, core-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units@ietf.org, core@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 603726279.036818-6dac32210ec645ad221f8d3b12ddec6f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EB30825C-E6E9-4A06-82FD-EEDBFAB745AC@tzi.org>
References: <158202743151.14138.7139954130434566804.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/WIS6PvNlUaRaC9LZPUtyoLQ6yeo>
Subject: Re: [core] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-?= =?utf-8?q?ietf-core-senml-more-units-04=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:44:44 -0000

Hi Mirja,

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The shepherd write-up says: "The document is intended for Standards Track and
> updates RFC8428." However, this document doesn't seem to update RFC8422. I
> assume this is correct and the write-up is a bit outdated? Just wanted to
> double-check...

The proposed resolution of the most recent discussion was indeed that we don’t update RFC 8422 here, but leave that to version number/must-understand field specifications.

Grüße, Carsten