Re: [core] Stateless proxy and Request-Tag

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 31 October 2019 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941E51200D7 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.865
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.865 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cZbMI8pXtagX for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD12C120099 for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-0191.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0191.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 473s3z6dGrzyVh; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:59:11 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20191031153842.GD25593@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:59:11 +0100
Cc: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, Core WG mailing list <core@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 594233948.695075-6314b954e7599d6339a21e026f9d8cfc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0AC425A1-E3C7-4AF5-820E-AF4B24E687AF@tzi.org>
References: <20191031133656.GA17667@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <009101d58ff6$22d85f70$68891e50$@augustcellars.com> <20191031145048.GB25593@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <00a001d58fff$e7d9f0f0$b78dd2d0$@augustcellars.com> <20191031153842.GD25593@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
To: Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/WkONsruoVw64LIdw3lQDUN6XYcE>
Subject: Re: [core] Stateless proxy and Request-Tag
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:59:16 -0000

I don’t understand how Request-Tag became necessary for Block2.
For me that is a Block1-only addition.

Grüße, Carsten