Re: [core] feedback on resource-directory and mirror-proxy (and base) drafts

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 09 March 2012 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA5F21F86DA for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:17:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.305
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.305 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XTBzlBbJ7w98 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:17:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DE321F8692 for <core@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:17:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q29GH50V008984; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:17:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.117] (p5B3E6A4A.dip.t-dialin.net [91.62.106.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA7767E1; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:17:04 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F59F906.4080906@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:17:03 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <314DD35C-E588-43E9-A9C5-B8DAA9CAE768@tzi.org>
References: <4F59F906.4080906@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: Heidi-Maria Rissanen <heidi-maria.rissanen@ericsson.com>, core <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] feedback on resource-directory and mirror-proxy (and base) drafts
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:17:46 -0000

On Mar 9, 2012, at 13:35, Jari Arkko wrote:

> 7. Section 5.8.2 and 5.9.1.1 in coap base draft seem to disagree (?) about whether Location-Path should be returned. Compare the above quote to the below one:
> 
>   "If the response includes one or more Location-Path Options and/or a
>   Location-Query Option, the values of these options specify the
>   location at which the resource was created.  Otherwise, the resource
>   was created at the request URI."

This seems to be hard to get right :-)

See http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/331 -- we should aim to be culturally compatible.

Grüße, Carsten