Re: [core] RFC 8768 on Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Hop-Limit Option
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 21 March 2020 07:34 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499913A0BEB for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cOfJCgeGzpUa for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF953A0BD8 for <core@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.147] (p548DCD70.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.205.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48kspk4YTkzyss; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 08:34:22 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200321042126.5078DF40713@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 08:34:22 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 606468861.952836-5551bb0088b3c26971f2d69b904e1808
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C9C99C44-AD7B-4354-9735-6F25D253DDDB@tzi.org>
References: <20200321042126.5078DF40713@rfc-editor.org>
To: "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/Y-TI9ZNT7SCzjXFRZWY4807TRCg>
Subject: Re: [core] RFC 8768 on Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Hop-Limit Option
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:34:35 -0000
Congratulations for the publication of the 13th RFC from this WG! The original -00 was submitted 2018-08-16, so it took a bit more than 1½ years to get this published (initial submission to approval was 2018-08-16 to 2019-11-26, so 1¼ years). This CoRE RFC is notable in that it originated in a non-IoT WG, the DOTS WG (DDoS Open Threat Signaling). I think there was some room for improvement in how we(*) handled this, but we did succeed, and in a time frame that is still quite reasonable. Thanks to the authors for bringing this to the CoRE WG! Grüße, Carsten (*) I think I can say that because it’s mostly me that is to blame here, and I am optimistic the current chairs can be better than my contribution at the time was... > On 2020-03-21, at 05:21, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 8768 > > Title: Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) > Hop-Limit Option > Author: M. Boucadair, > T. Reddy.K, > J. Shallow > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: March 2020 > Mailbox: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, > kondtir@gmail.com, > supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com > Pages: 8 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-07.txt > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8768 > > DOI: 10.17487/RFC8768 > > The presence of Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) proxies may > lead to infinite forwarding loops, which is undesirable. To prevent > and detect such loops, this document specifies the Hop-Limit CoAP > option. > > This document is a product of the Constrained RESTful Environments Working Group of the IETF. > > This is now a Proposed Standard. > > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track > protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official > Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this > memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
- [core] RFC 8768 on Constrained Application Protoc… rfc-editor
- Re: [core] RFC 8768 on Constrained Application Pr… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] RFC 8768 on Constrained Application Pr… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [core] RFC 8768 on Constrained Application Pr… Carsten Bormann