IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] Base value for SenML

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 20 October 2015 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4016E1B2B62 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GmFcdd2z8vi for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334971B2C59 for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9KKYsLN022635; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:34:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nar.local (p5DC7F6AE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.246.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ngRXG0KQMz4nqd; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:34:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5626A56B.8070904@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:34:51 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.5 (Macintosh/20150923)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Amsüss <c.amsuess@energyharvesting.at>
References: <2874C29A-943E-4A44-A71A-192565D9A437@ericsson.com> <20151020201936.GA14162@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151020201936.GA14162@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/YUWIY8IMvbNUfzNdIwlhs-widfM>
Cc: "draft-jennings-core-senml@tools.ietf.org" <draft-jennings-core-senml@tools.ietf.org>, core <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] Base value for SenML
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:38:56 -0000

Christian Amsüss wrote:
> Alternatively, we might want to consider dropping the explicit typing
> information at altogether and have a single "v" (with "bv" as base). The
> draft doesn't contain a rationale on it -- why are there distinct
> attributes at all for what is in my impression modelled as one property?

(That wasn't clear to me either -- if they are mutually exclusive as
they are today, the information is already in the type of the value.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status