Re: [core] =?iso-8859-1?Q?=F0=9F=94=94_CoRE_Working_Group_Adoption_call_for_draft-ja?=rvinen-core-fasor-02
"Carles Gomez Montenegro" <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> Wed, 18 December 2019 11:29 UTC
Return-Path: <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EBA120903 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 03:29:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ssC_rSL_e15E for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 03:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from violet.upc.es (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50424120059 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 03:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from entelserver.upc.edu (entelserver.upc.es [147.83.39.4]) by violet.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id xBIBTCwg045890; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:29:12 +0100
Received: from webmail.entel.upc.edu (webmail.entel.upc.edu [147.83.39.6]) by entelserver.upc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951F81D53C1; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:29:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 83.37.3.185 by webmail.entel.upc.edu with HTTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:29:12 +0100
Message-ID: <f7507b0ae3c95dd591a2a10268486ba9.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <2D679FD0-F95F-488E-BCC4-0B90693FDA3A@tzi.org>
References: <A41A43E6-3FA8-4E09-B32F-18194E0A606F@tzi.org> <2D679FD0-F95F-488E-BCC4-0B90693FDA3A@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:29:12 +0100
From: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21-1.fc14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at violet
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: ACL matched, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:29:13 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/Yje1F288ocqFka37uVUoL2PZlj4>
Subject: Re: [core] ð CoRE Working Group Adoption call for draft-jarvinen-core-fasor-02
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:29:17 -0000
Dear all, Sorry for the late message! I support the adoption of draft-jarvinen-core-fasor-02. Based on our previous experience with CoCoA, in my opinion, the document will benefit from evaluation under a range of scenarios and conditions in terms of (but not limited to): - Network topologies (e.g. mesh, tree, single-hop, etc.). - Technologies (especially with different RTT characteristics). - Technology settings (e.g. acknowledged vs unacknowledged). - Traffic loads. - BER/PER. Cheers, Carles > I know we are entering the slow season, so this is a gentle reminder: > >> On Nov 19, 2019, at 09:03, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: >> >> This message starts a three-week working group adoption call. >> (Two weeks because the WG call partially overlaps an IETF and the US >> Thanksgiving week.) >> >> If you have read the draft and support adopting it, please say so. >> If you see a problem with adopting it as a WG document, please tell us. > > So far, nobody indicated their support for this adoption on this mailing > list outside the author team. > Is really nobody else in the CoRE WG interested in this? > > GrüÃe, Carsten
- [core] 🔔 CoRE Working Group Adoption call for dra… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] 🔔 CoRE Working Group Adoption call for… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] 🔔 CoRE Working Group Adoption call for… Zhen Cao
- Re: [core] 🔔 CoRE Working Group Adoption call for… Hui Deng
- Re: [core] =?iso-8859-1?Q?=F0=9F=94=94_CoRE_Worki… Carles Gomez Montenegro
- Re: [core] ð CoRE Working Group Adoption call … Carsten Bormann