Re: [core] "No Content" CoAP option (was Re: "Too Many Requests Response Code for CoAP" draft (draft-keranen-core-too-many-reqs-00))

[peter van der Stok <[e-mail]>]

> 
>>> We had that in the -01 version of the draft, but that didn't seem to
>>> gain traction, so we've switched to a new content-format to indicate
>>> this status. Would this work for pub/sub?
>> 
>> Do you remember what was the reason for lack of traction?
> 
> Not sure since I wasn't at IETF 100 where it was discussed. But there
> are some notes in the meeting minutes [1].
> 
I was at ietf100, presenting the pending draft.
In short, a new response code was not encouraged; so the suggested 2.06 
was out.
Response code 5.03 (service unavailable) was suggested by Carsten, but 
we are clearly not talking about an unavailable service:
the service is available but slow.........

Not seeing any other obvious response code, Klaus suggested the 
content-format option.

Cheerio,

peter