Re: [core] #177: Response suppression for multicast not defined

Hi Carsten,

Could you please clarify exactly what change was incorporated into http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-08?

When I look at the Fix #177 cited below 

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core/current/msg02382.html

it refers to 

	"So yes, I think there should be new text in 4.4 that says the reliability
 	layer does indicate to the r/r layer that this was a multicast."

I did not see this type of text in section 4.4 however.  But maybe I a m missing something?

Thanks,

Akbar

-----Original Message-----
From: core-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:core-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of core issue tracker
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 12:25 PM
To: draft-ietf-core-coap@tools.ietf.org; cabo@tzi.org
Cc: core@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [core] #177: Response suppression for multicast not defined

#177: Response suppression for multicast not defined

Changes (by cabo@…):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed

Comment:

 Fixed in [524]:

 Fix #177

-- 
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Reporter:  cabo@…              |       Owner:  draft-ietf-core-coap@…
     Type:  protocol defect     |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  major               |   Milestone:
Component:  coap                |     Version:
 Severity:  Active WG Document  |  Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:                      |
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Ticket URL: </ticket/177#comment:1>
core <http://tools.ietf.org/core/>

_______________________________________________
core mailing list
core@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core