IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-05

"Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com> Fri, 27 September 2019 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DFD120120; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 05:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DZV0sKXqmhWJ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 05:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6321A12004C; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 05:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369441EE4A93; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:32:47 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PqE2lbRZx_yk; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:32:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from golem.sobco.com (golem.sobco.com [136.248.127.162]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC5401EE4A7C; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:32:43 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <30446701-ADE2-4231-A987-CB6AE906A3E8@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:32:43 -0400
Cc: Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>, "draft-ietf-core-hop-limit.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-core-hop-limit.all@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <896FEE7F-66EB-4639-AA1F-0C641FFFC53E@sobco.com>
References: <156954173082.31982.2465512704956520690@ietfa.amsl.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313276CF@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <A63F6779-653D-4DC6-9A79-E3983A742714@sobco.com> <20190927114946.igkh7f3evmclwt4p@EMB-918HFH01> <30446701-ADE2-4231-A987-CB6AE906A3E8@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/bIzErCmdKGiCbNnPpEvrTFPkGNM>
Subject: Re: [core] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-05
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:32:50 -0000


> On Sep 27, 2019, at 8:24 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> .  Generally, we don’t use “updates” for specifications that merely exercise an extension point, so I don’t think hop-limit “updates” RFC 7252, but the “updates” label is in active discussion already anyway.

a major advantage of listing something like this as an update is that the implementor will know about it - if there is no hint in the index entry for the old RFC that there is a related RFC it would be
very easy to overlook 

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email