IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-04: (with COMMENT)

"Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Tue, 18 February 2020 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C80120811; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 07:21:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=UwI4B4y1; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=mfU5Z+C9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MoYuvB_M8BuH; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 07:21:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 176E9120130; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 07:21:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B6C22007; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:21:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap21 ([10.202.2.71]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:21:53 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=BTD71 ZuuVyMfsJAO0qmD42ylw9lVlTY0MwFcQBzLeMk=; b=UwI4B4y1mw9rVPN6WIMr1 WQ9ihbGKp3x44a2+5O6ClOisj4dqNUhO6rSgfnB2F5ULC9bZN5922ErKaBwko3MB p+BzuaPgx/9+OELW5TWNYuWwvYy4cqHHVM3lcdC91ltTQUlrMg3Z0yAZ8ydmNWSF GptKOsVUphrJCLR2evabraaXzzHQW4Hzugdr2hdnTia6EHatRnYPbIEMvet3ZB84 hMej8xo8iroRyqrn09Fvi3iusT8Jufage/NWBVlCY+Rwuz5WecMrUKezhhG0Q4WR TiXe0lJAS9ZRcAbGv2X3cLtp5JWqp4m2FxLsZM68syE646JPC4AnJf0gHBWIXQ2o g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=BTD71ZuuVyMfsJAO0qmD42ylw9lVlTY0MwFcQBzLe Mk=; b=mfU5Z+C99GlZ2F2TU885BA50nPEbUui44ziPmbAFJbPT1UXbYbYV+8hHX 07JJcWWM8LGJuc698Ro3IKBDOjPUdmADeP4IaNMB0AoWmNGc8kIlMG3WAA0MdvmH T/QsXXB7BqN3S5aEJV3lBcM9rt5Svgt9PybUrPfANYSPLXDhXVJm+enPyJ/Mh2zy o4Ut8pn6oWkFro8RcV/Fet7PrwPUJ183QNSBAPYYoI79MSnS1rJu3CMVymniVH1k QDrB4xs3hVCDi2VeJDv9zeu0t8KsWJ7R1Ts332hQ3n2FtvNowAlHb6kbuYryAuQE oG/uCqKC2PdZa02phE1BS7WkoBc5Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:EAFMXmw_zv3SfkP2joWESTP7YcKyybgls4tABvpISydbCYJSUIlVWQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrjeekgdejiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtgfesthhqredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdetlhgv gigvhicuofgvlhhnihhkohhvfdcuoegrrghmvghlnhhikhhovhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrd hfmheqnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep rggrmhgvlhhnihhkohhvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:EAFMXrs-nSr7tnO77owvCw2OZ7moHbqvYmFo-oALG_la-XmgFUSCpw> <xmx:EAFMXn4FSri5hT4_K0GnfVA1TkTWOApAd-LerDYLMfJrHp53xVXuqQ> <xmx:EAFMXiSehtQFH3v_kj0F8U1ZJQ-fEoLU1gAYO9RYxhh89KjSIIFbww> <xmx:EQFMXrFxKzMopcgx0CLlM_ydQoMX6m84jvdu6KL60Za1SOPTwvysDg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 62D6866006B; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:21:52 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-802-g7a41c81-fmstable-20200203v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <42ef449f-9494-4045-a48d-0030dcaf1c77@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F6B5D8D6-B8B5-4957-B447-0EA315445230@kuehlewind.net>
References: <158202743151.14138.7139954130434566804.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <EB30825C-E6E9-4A06-82FD-EEDBFAB745AC@tzi.org> <F6B5D8D6-B8B5-4957-B447-0EA315445230@kuehlewind.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:21:20 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Jaime Jimenez <jaime@iki.fi>
Cc: core-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, core@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/cISzEnQjW9RMmr8yfEyDh0XDcs4>
Subject: Re: [core] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:21:56 -0000

Hi all,

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, at 1:45 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> That’s fine. Thanks for confirming!

I removed "update RFC8422" from the IESG ballot, but I haven't updated the write-up.

Jaime, can you please update the write-up to match the latest draft version?

Best Regards,
Alexey

> Mirja
> 
> 
> > On 18. Feb 2020, at 14:44, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Mirja,
> > 
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> COMMENT:
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> 
> >> The shepherd write-up says: "The document is intended for Standards Track and
> >> updates RFC8428." However, this document doesn't seem to update RFC8422. I
> >> assume this is correct and the write-up is a bit outdated? Just wanted to
> >> double-check...
> > 
> > The proposed resolution of the most recent discussion was indeed that we don’t update RFC 8422 here, but leave that to version number/must-understand field specifications.
> > 
> > Grüße, Carsten
> > 
> > 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email