IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-core-problem-details-05

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 24 June 2022 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69ECCC14CF05; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 02:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ZlTDOIbdSKT; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 02:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE534C15AD32; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 02:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LTsHv4hSlzDCfY; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:28:43 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <62B57BC0.9080706@btconnect.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:28:43 +0200
Cc: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>, "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art@ietf.org>, Core WG mailing list <core@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-core-problem-details.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 677755723.2549599-d928748dd9d0f8722bd8d98b0f9e6d3e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <72F3E696-8AE9-4BC8-A50F-DAB960CEAEC1@tzi.org>
References: <165511479760.19573.12671700576299137749@ietfa.amsl.com> <63D13796-758D-469B-AFA8-3050C9F87819@tzi.org> <dde9d36c-61e5-afcc-e15a-787c99d5fba9@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <CAN40gSuhSAOH3WRPETXU4s1468eXb_g-=sfWFmXXTvekEddqYQ@mail.gmail.com> <034DDF0F-FEF2-456B-B9ED-76B8F2B6C4BF@tzi.org> <CAN40gSuGJOChjAY9fFD5Gwqn9CaLH09-m5MKb5Gfg8HH9WYjvA@mail.gmail.com> <0359E066-79F3-4AAB-92A5-30B5E01D16CE@tzi.org> <CAN40gSuR12WE=NC-MqGvCX1z+XNVn+5X94VFH1qHE373gbQR_w@mail.gmail.com> <62B57BC0.9080706@btconnect.com>
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/g6S4OVPFLEFKpP5PwaeZtgmB2xA>
Subject: Re: [core] [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-core-problem-details-05
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:28:57 -0000

On 2022-06-24, at 10:54, tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> The I-D was revised to include a YANG leaf 'language' with a horrendous YANG pattern spanning 25 lines.

That is hilarious!

Thanks for the pointer.

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-29.html

Search for “leaf language {” or use a Chrome-specific URL:

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-29.html#:~:text=leaf%20language%20%7B

So they did copy the ABNF from RFC 5646, turned it into a regex, and copied it in…

Maybe the regex we have in 
https://github.com/core-wg/core-problem-details/pull/40
would have been a bit more easy to handle.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email