Re: [core] 🔔 WG adoption of draft-boucadair-core-hop-limit

Carsten Bormann <> Tue, 18 September 2018 06:28 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9531130EE1 for <>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 23:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id alS-IlT82QhT for <>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 23:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0298A130ECC for <>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 23:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w8I6SgXb014829 for <>; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:28:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [] ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42DtNp5cpBzDXJC; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:28:42 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Carsten Bormann <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:28:41 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 558944921.475812-a5e04ffe3a70044031d9e1bfae3d7287
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <>
To: Core <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [core] =?utf-8?q?=F0=9F=94=94_WG_adoption_of_draft-boucadair-cor?= =?utf-8?q?e-hop-limit?=
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 06:28:49 -0000

While there have not been many postings to the list supporting this, at the interims we also had good oral support, and there was no negative feedback.  So we have consensus to adopt.

Authors: please re-submit as draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-00.

Grüße, Carsten

> On 10. Sep 2018, at 21:54, carsten bormann <> wrote:
> It seems we have converged at draft-boucadair-core-hop-limit as the draft providing the hop limit function needed by DOTS, but we haven’t done the formal WG adoption yet.
> This is a formal call for adoption of this draft as a WG document of the CoRE WG.
> If you have read the draft and support adopting it, please say so.
> If you see a problem with adopting it as a WG document, please tell us.
> For both, remember that WG adoption does not mean that we already have consensus on all the details, just that this is the right working document to address the issue (and that we should address the issue in the first place).
> Please do mention any issues that you already know; these also can be brought up in Wednesday’s virtual interim Webex call.
> This formal WG adoption call runs until the end of September 17th.
> (Given the state of the discussion, we might then have a Working Group last call of an updated document right next.)
> Grüße, Carsten
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list