Re: [core] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-new-block-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Fri, 07 May 2021 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D783A22F8; Fri, 7 May 2021 07:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7yW61wHzFQyr; Fri, 7 May 2021 07:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F29B3A22CD; Fri, 7 May 2021 07:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:b856:e449:5fc8:1058]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90EBD600355; Fri, 7 May 2021 17:03:16 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1620396196; bh=g6fmkQ84YVI44jLAlzwet5HxWdzcyn4z/GNEB0CuADI=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=mTHV3zttWZAI5XI79p39ivJtN2h3LdQ+ad5hL2arYSKy9pWoNs2Jto+rlqru1V0FY ZgRjM5sgtn4I69vkarZlISiG4FqsABhl84wdazV4y8YcW4ctcrC4Iz7dTNfE9k7GfV BvfKsGWO0PGry70Q2UqciUcKU3cTvjE0I7WooUtc=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <666D5FF1-9E96-4522-A0FB-0A3042225BE7@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_297D5ED4-CA3D-4B62-BABC-37135C0FEA5C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 17:03:16 +0300
In-Reply-To: <29803_1620395762_609546F2_29803_68_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353787B4@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org>, "core-chairs@ietf.org" <core-chairs@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>, "marco.tiloca@ri.se" <marco.tiloca@ri.se>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
References: <162039183121.15574.16597240090409070575@ietfa.amsl.com> <29803_1620395762_609546F2_29803_68_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353787B4@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
X-MailScanner-ID: 90EBD600355.A2DE9
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/jrSxiY9ufXwJ61WFDDFFWrnuxIs>
Subject: Re: [core] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-new-block-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 14:03:43 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-5-7, at 16:56, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> There is not evaluation paper, but as stated in the thread with Eric V., extensive tests were made that confirmed the benefits. The code giving Q-Block support is out there in the public domain. A pointer is included in the write-up.

is there any public information about the methodology and results for these extensive tests? I understand there is no paper, but is there a presentation or anything else?

Thanks,
Lars