[core] Do we need a CORE charter item for CoAP support of Sleepy Nodes?

"Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com> Thu, 01 August 2013 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC85221E8124 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwnGFxb2FTsO for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out1.interdigital.com (smtp-out1.interdigital.com [64.208.228.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E48221E8153 for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SAM.InterDigital.com ([10.30.2.11]) by smtp-out1.interdigital.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:02:35 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CE8ED0.89F9DB30"
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:02:30 -0400
Message-ID: <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C0537E49C@SAM.InterDigital.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Do we need a CORE charter item for CoAP support of Sleepy Nodes?
Thread-Index: Ac6Oyy3lzRKNmIjvRwGckETkXD5QwgABUTTA
From: "Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>
To: <core@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2013 16:02:35.0726 (UTC) FILETIME=[89D766E0:01CE8ED0]
Subject: [core] Do we need a CORE charter item for CoAP support of Sleepy Nodes?
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:02:43 -0000

Hi,

 

 

Carsten asked me to send this message out to the WG list as we did not
have a chance to discuss the Sleepy Node topic in this IETF due to a
lack of time on the agenda. 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

We have several current I-Ds in CORE (and LWIG) that discusses the topic
of Sleepy Nodes.  Among those are:

 

 

draft-dijk-core-sleepy-reqs-00
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dijk-core-sleepy-reqs/> 

 

draft-dijk-core-sleepy-solutions-01
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dijk-core-sleepy-solutions/> 

 

draft-hong-lwig-sleepynode-problem-statement-00
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hong-lwig-sleepynode-problem-sta
tement/> 

 

draft-rahman-core-sleepy-03
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rahman-core-sleepy/> 

 

 

Hence the following question to the WG:

 

*         Should we have a CORE deliverable for CoAP support of Sleepy
Nodes?

 

 

Please write back with your thoughts!

 

 

 

Best Regards,

 

 

Akbar