IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-03: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 03 June 2021 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52203A18C2; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqkWhNl-3rNA; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 13:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A11183A18C1; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 13:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id a8so7664175ioa.12; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 13:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yftb4GbrUHzrU64v5PtMKSRuzI0DKPpNVxYTs/h+7Lk=; b=txvPRK/vxPfS3ypOFPI5a0W3tb7i7o5OTwgkxkcG7C37vFvi1dR7A1yPmFTf86mix0 joEfCNUOLszuQp8sXVy1vKLeNNIMaRls//UJEtFWIbLnLY/Vd9hSWdZ+HDe+XHhCVjGz ZhaD3V/ryaYmGgJGEgAkT79gJmN43Rz0blHgZceItX8rV0tnUiYIz3ti3c8cu/7kXdOg tTaz7RV+T0nfWMd0DDSmPLSMLpWWdPa2q/j6pSyht1wREB6pHdCoQE86EdYK2uJV7da5 UrkY+gMx6oOi8aEtSOABcSH/pfWeK/kgBvcnmPUq+XYEL71I5mKcc3px8BkCxDpjhxux KAzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yftb4GbrUHzrU64v5PtMKSRuzI0DKPpNVxYTs/h+7Lk=; b=eFbmka90LDUg2pUmcPXm/19Ap04y5Ir2+DBJ7jOC1OatP/GfmCSFB8w9xdWz9cx+uc yLeiixTOvwMHCYAU4T3bmyefymEG4aAD+QzuIQJ1LudrwvqCZzkYiOWi56qcalk85VHN uLds1mj9xT06Vm+MEKw6+LtSIWz3nS+VCCHJDuD92Lbq05zDJM069Co5Cov4icgGuFYH JVXjar1M8wr24HElPKNGBDwtxuaXTa9kDYcVnfSi137Aoj0jVe95ebnJTGw/WSTePQVQ rpMC9gQnCjkcaQzKNq8VmA3HfTGF3hyyGzcXhN0iMXwDc6+odrGW874I5MbmkBwOmHxT Xa5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530v+TsekLdQwyn4Z9IucPFpjrc6NTcgIh5RpVhNWWU3cOjEDwgd VB5g+gqURHi/FmRutNpggRnPQBQG8aYQjQDv2H8k4vxw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzK1Xh90kYy+pMncdugq6jBcyCQTwKamWbby708z0eDlzyh/yZq6MkTaoFAxaIrukz5e2qRikpojimByTxhmws=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:1223:: with SMTP id z3mr845384iot.97.1622751375014; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 13:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162204318386.5937.225407037704905384@ietfa.amsl.com> <816A83B9-1A98-443B-91EF-0DD1259A6ED6@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <816A83B9-1A98-443B-91EF-0DD1259A6ED6@tzi.org>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 13:16:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxRLkUBq6+a1VTbF6M-KfXCa+cjpGo7_0D5vOpdq8SSHug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-core-senml-versions@ietf.org, core-chairs@ietf.org, "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>, jaime@iki.fi
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000443fe005c3e23f76"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/pRCksobzGWWi7UOXJ2bU5Qv1llE>
Subject: Re: [core] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 20:16:23 -0000

Ah, good point, you're not throwing them away forever.

Thanks!

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 1:11 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> On 2021-05-26, at 17:33, Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-03: No Objection
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Given the very constrained space, I wonder if it's wise to reserve 0 and
> 2 for
> > no real purpose. IIUC these would still result in version numbers > 10
> and
> > therefore not break anything, yes?
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> The cop-out (end of Section 3) is:
>
>    These four reserved feature codes are not to be used with any
>    more specific semantics except in a specification that updates the
>    present specification.
>
> So we still can use these bits, we just haven’t said yet, how.
> But indeed, we could have used 0 and 2 as the first bits to be allocated
> (much harder to do anything useful with 1 and 3).
> Not sure we want to change this now to reclaim those bits now, but we
> still could.
> Any reaction, CoRE WG?
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email