[core] Base value for SenML
Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> Tue, 20 October 2015 16:49 UTC
Return-Path: <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009031A924A for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YuuPKzQnKagc for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61E861A923A for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79626d000006adf-cb-5626709145d1
Received: from ESESSHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 27.4A.27359.19076265; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:49:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB205.ericsson.se ([169.254.5.167]) by ESESSHC005.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:49:21 +0200
From: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
To: core <core@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Base value for SenML
Thread-Index: AQHRC1dDMNEN09UMPkqkZ05Tnzse6A==
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:49:19 +0000
Message-ID: <2874C29A-943E-4A44-A71A-192565D9A437@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.148]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <90E82487155C8F44A0407B5231A288EC@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje7EArUwg1PrNCz2vV3PbHFg2gRW ByaPJUt+Mnl8ufyZLYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvj56cNLAX32St2zj7N3MDYxtbFyMkhIWAi 0bZjByuELSZx4d56sLiQwFFGialv1boYuYDsJYwSk1avYwdJsAnYS0xe85ERxBYRkJDo/Lof LM4sEC0x/S9EjbCArMTbF9+ZIWqUJJZP+8cEYetJdN95BNbLIqAqsW3RE7BlvEAzF35oBosz Ah3x/dQaJoiZ4hK3nsxngjhOQGLJnvPMELaoxMvH/6COVpJoXPKEFaJeT+LG1ClAMzmAbGuJ Cw0JEGFtiWULXzNDrBKUODnzCcsERtFZSDbMQtI9C6F7FpLuWUi6FzCyrmIULU4tTspNNzLS Sy3KTC4uzs/Ty0st2cQIjJ2DW34b7GB8+dzxEKMAB6MSD++DdNUwIdbEsuLK3EOM0hwsSuK8 zUwPQoUE0hNLUrNTUwtSi+KLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUwll0tq6+8Fv2l3O6kt/sapm1rzf1X569m eteYvUpV1fb2xMmPbrTbSSV89335aKKA3LL9bn2pFUY5S0zkTpRodE77du2V/veyZyd9ec/l yl3ZYvozKtH5h5mH876PKvJM7654lV7+v+fSCper0Vubeda/Pbsk6fHVG/PXV2qcnvmusH5L 6QuFViWW4oxEQy3mouJEAPmcawV+AgAA
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/qcAdof-LuPd6W3dIiWjOtLPrn-o>
Cc: "draft-jennings-core-senml@tools.ietf.org" <draft-jennings-core-senml@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [core] Base value for SenML
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:49:25 -0000
Hi CoRE WG folks, Currently the base object for SenML allows defining a base name (to be prepended on all entry names), a base time (to be added to all entry times), and a base unit (a "default unit" if one is not defined in entry). Now the question is should we also have "base value" that would be used as a default when an entry does not have any value? This could be useful for example in a case where there is a ton of measurements with exactly same value and only very few differing values. Then, one could define e.g., just different time or name for all entires and leave the value part out completely when it is equal to the base value. This seems to make sense and would apparently require only fairly small modifications in the draft. If we want to do this, we should most likely call that new base value "bv" and then rename the "boolean value" to "vb" -- and for consistency change "string value" to "vs". Opinions? Cheers, Ari
- [core] Base value for SenML Ari Keränen
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Christian Amsüss
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Ari Keränen
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Ari Keränen
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Christian Amsüss
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Ari Keränen
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Ari Keränen
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML - mystery p Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [core] Base value for SenML Cullen Jennings (fluffy)