IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] 🔔 WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-yang-cbor-mapping-00

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Wed, 20 April 2016 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4E712E338 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20mFCu31_huS for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBE4812E028 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id e190so43706703lfe.0 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=jyw6Oae66Y4nf0fvpaiLmAnNBa6QP+JK6EeSAk3tdl8=; b=Xku88hM5Kcz/SBH/VPA/Dcz6EwI/2P45N+mnLeogUh1TlHuxvTZD6AYsNZJXjPTbf1 nReuL7y+ICj4BDI0pAHqLXGdVjhj4gPEkVxGElyXV1ESx1TOsdg1zArej4vfwBL3btZh JqgO7VlE4lNdzrRxoQktk/5E0LjY3DUgVSghtRKsJlyRFs9/uQy9H8uXJaDMP+YzmHgA jmfwEYYTWTxlin03lqKnCBRkNdgmZB0FOXAkMkpfGl4qIQy/nU0QtSCqtX/1kR6vPx9W FtMIWeEua5qyKdsdj/ZD9mkvrTQgrvdWCmXwCOEsLnaXZTcgWROX198oXBow9gBUdOBx Nfbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=jyw6Oae66Y4nf0fvpaiLmAnNBa6QP+JK6EeSAk3tdl8=; b=Yb7iwypg61Zon6VOcODxvd9AyH9XuzkBQMofAKbVJQHnecsyeMuUrJL+HWzkTX1LZ/ IM91AJ8+RfbVVXaQL3iHiFyNTlKFVAtV61VaQS6xGfIJwbIJfGHhgIjlNETSh9DRHazo /a67t7hVk2NA7meWO1ZWyXnRlfPkyvAmw4k0eC8Po4ODFxF3JsRcz7nuOWnR+81jAZQb 4Na752vYzcdYy4hRVWMHPVSPK0egHfkLkuAGx8gLe8bZ1uu4+n4eGQjemTba0yOGvZxe HIEEk4oLm+T544fR1xICowTWUCmvZ3fzGaZeAyfTZY96htnlOPyuxdRAFyl73W3KRbV8 KAmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXvjiMhdzJDAaE3ke93m+IW6Us+7DIrIRDAkU7bcWT8L95oHl5CxdvVZx0DdiYwHMpIniyQBVwa2cBxSQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.64.212 with SMTP id n203mr4325833lfa.62.1461167438701; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.198.70 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <570A4583.2030100@tzi.org>
References: <570A4583.2030100@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:50:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHQ5Xw3zkLFysEZKEeW+dO-jtv_BzdiDGguU8PP-CdJEAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fc26a244b390530ec8eb9"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/sPl5LzKeZL9zHbHdgGCRT6VbbCM>
Cc: "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] 🔔 WG adoption of draft-veillette-core-yang-cbor-mapping-00
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:50:42 -0000

Hi,

I am in favor of adoption.
We plan to implement this draft for use with CoMI
and possibly RESTCONF.


Andy


On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> In Buenos Aires, we discussed the adoption of
> draft-veillette-core-yang-cbor-mapping-00 but not enough people had read
> the document to go for an in-room consensus call.
>
> This is a two-week call for adoption of
> draft-veillette-core-yang-cbor-mapping-00 as a WG document of CoRE.
> Specifically, if you (1) support or (2) have an objection to this
> decision, please speak up on the mailing list by 2016-04-24.
>
> Note that this work is explicitly covered by our charter, so discussions
> of which WG should work on this are off-topic.
>
> As always, adoption of a document as a WG document is not a vote on
> whether we already have reached last-call state; the intention is to
> work on the WG document after adoption for a while to get it ready for
> last call.  If you want to combine your support/objection with technical
> comments, this is certainly welcome so we can accelerate that process.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email