Re: [core] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-resource-directory-25: (with COMMENT)

[Christian Amsüss <[e-mail]>]

(This is one of the point-to-point follow-up mails on the RD -25
reviews; for the preface, please see the preceding mail on "The various
positions on draft-ietf-core-resource-directory-25" at
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/xWLomwwhovkU-CPGNxnvs40BhaM/>).

As COMMENT:

> In Section 9.2, you might want to mention that you're talking about a
> sub-registry under "Internet Control Message Protocol version 6 (ICMPv6)
> Parameters".

response:

Expanded (in https://github.com/core-wg/resource-directory/pull/300).

> In Section 9.3, you enumerate six fields in each registration, but the
> initial table of entries has only five columns.  It's obvious (I think) that
> the sixth column would be "this document" for all entries, but I suggest that
> you should either include the column or some prose making this explicit
> (since everything else is).

response:

There is a sentence in the paragraph below the figure to that respect.