[core] Discussion about draft-ietf-core-sid - IANA Specification required sub-registry

ivaylo petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io> Wed, 05 December 2018 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ivaylo@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BD0126C01 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:07:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21cG28gO411k for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:07:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 474E8126DBF for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 07:07:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id y1so13553636wmi.3 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 07:07:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=20AldBhDnaKv6ISt6r+bat9yCKQSqH60poantmP/8pE=; b=0CINFj6zxrvBFMEJFE3OBrvdijK8qdU6Y+pLsecjR4ib5SxqHYe8KBuOHVDvkbApOs PpF4R+yFHRtIzCNk9MNADbEo5OxeUP459Mzt67wdoGqH1ue5kKoU1+SeeTDWqyUXpLKw s7vrVhkkRtjNvxm6FG3S1bKJ3ij3tAavAARIYDaNmUEhM2+OmMS2lHC922p164ipgZti HvI0kc7IZ/jsCqEhZyt330sUAoUVyUP5/i1d4TYQuRMgnVH2Qf4GNNr5UAPr8tH3H63d OKnvxoClG1Jg5+MJpfcBMOrv4p/v7yLhAofQlV5T/DkbwRjvBfSDZKiRy3obxpeGXi6F sVYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=20AldBhDnaKv6ISt6r+bat9yCKQSqH60poantmP/8pE=; b=tRaGi6OHtJ3R8Eq18wsSRJ69TGkrDl8dupSsAkrzOEVW3SaEKfdyU32S1ZJpEBgyNS ElsJgLErZS/HXVv4N/wGI9FnX0/tkkCCrCj35UOQA5WCT6j149Tr7kzYOxJE+N/8HEel rsIZzMseSFdbfoTE6fFgNnLRHnfqLAF/Xhxi+qcUTjvFvLefzokS6QubrORmoNZhjXmr 87okrkeS3DHXzyN3UnEY0D9EIFbuJyOJQHbvlfk9l/uRU9WAcWvwo5BolzeD9wOYkPlH a6VaedftXuo044Nvx8Ctt6Le63oXpPFnsmxfu4IY+gyCF/EYI+agOJvYQ3q03+oDdlaj KgeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYqD1MnrjhVlvXatXZcFxtfMzxdeW5fMZKVW7CKW2NH+h1RB6xt OfuIOiz9MfSHYzal3s1dlvTrmRJJk4v5TJL47kJInVrLaCOYRQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XvUmTzXlBu5gRzAzQDXH6VbhvlIJHf3gZ/HEw9dGPxPum833zMTtocs4sce/hBn1XPXjSDZC5Tdh31Xke8S/s=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:bb42:: with SMTP id l63mr15468277wmf.47.1544022418283; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 07:06:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: ivaylo petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 16:06:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJFkdRy36w9FaQxxCX-1W=EybgVjQrYO2s6ySTYRBinn1jagyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: core@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-core-sid@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c47b19057c47bb4d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/wxUMK30lSs6raidPZC79m9wMpns>
Subject: [core] Discussion about draft-ietf-core-sid - IANA Specification required sub-registry
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 15:07:12 -0000

Dear all,

We have been working on -05 of the draft-ietf-core-sid draft (the
work-in-progress version is available here
<https://github.com/Acklio/yang-cbor/blob/sid-v05/draft-ietf-core-sid-latest.md>).
During the discussion, Michel Veillette proposed to add a new sub-section
of the IANA considerations dedicated on the "Specification required"
portion of the SIDs from "IANA SID Mega-Range Registry". This subsection
specifies what will be the necessary information for each entry in the
sub-registry. The proposed fields are:

* The SID range entry point.
* The SID range size.
* The YANG module name.
* The name of the standard organization
* The specification identifier or URI

Do you consider that we need to change something in that list?

Best regards,
Ivaylo Petrov

P.S: I agree with the proposal and find the provided list sufficient.