Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 09 November 2013 01:26 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D53F21E808D for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:26:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kCUdO8dwJUCp for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:25:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7A811E80E2 for <core@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:25:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA91PrmM015741; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 02:25:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.199.5.35] (209-82-80-116.dedicated.allstream.net [209.82.80.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58388A99; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 02:25:50 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAByMhx9aWkuDR397hYYNBVQCmz1v5XLvihuieTUQE3YPOZqZJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:25:47 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B29BEB02-85AF-454C-A500-F5B6F01E9D6F@tzi.org>
References: <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C0561B74B@SAM.InterDigital.com> <CAByMhx9aWkuDR397hYYNBVQCmz1v5XLvihuieTUQE3YPOZqZJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Fossati <tho@koanlogic.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: Core <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 01:26:04 -0000
On 08 Nov 2013, at 01:48, Thomas Fossati <tho@koanlogic.com> wrote: > out of CoRE scope At this stage of the discussion, I would be less concerned with the WG scope than with finding out what the industry actually needs to be standardized to foster interoperability. If there are items within this set that are outside CoRE scope, we can always try to find a home for them, either by rechartering or by finding another WG. But it is important to have a clear understanding of the items that we think need to be speced. At a level a bit more specific than we have been discussing so far. Grüße, Carsten
- [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic weigengyu
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Thomas Fossati
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Dijk, Esko
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Abhijan Bhattacharyya
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Carsten Bormann
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic weigengyu
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic Pete St. Pierre
- Re: [core] WG interest in Sleepy Node topic weigengyu