Re: [core] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-new-block-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Tue, 11 May 2021 04:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49D73A0A92; Mon, 10 May 2021 21:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id shahm5B34alg; Mon, 10 May 2021 21:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1035D3A0A8F; Mon, 10 May 2021 21:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr01.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.65]) by opfednr20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4FfQYQ5bjWz20sL; Tue, 11 May 2021 06:53:46 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1620708826; bh=J5jPOZFyIooIUduGeT+9KPBS/xczKqqbmn1URyafhZc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Pvy+ZgXjaLbt7Kq7IELgMqBnziUsUEMt0eU3Qa4j9+6Pktqr3hze+pLSOG0iqDl1n gz6H7OKC+fAZEk8EtuWtEmmcoz3JN+hohpc2hbc2qwnpQf73Jj+oyokLdJvf0d8+yr M2VpR3o8UQCep2ziMcpA0TXlnhKa+9Kf41BfhCRE/JNbDu0PEs1p9jHryETkQqKPlY +DbKRGwknaYkrJrzNYZ3r/ORVl1jeDT5xOIv1z00o3xdvIfeesyj17Lrv2f3DgiTk+ 4BA/uRVMKlwjeCp7cQdiH8DarHISsd/ZZNS3RkCzIdUQEGN0u85Wa9ACc+pLleTUBY dAL4slfHiI5gw==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.20]) by opfednr01.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4FfQYQ4LlYzDq7S; Tue, 11 May 2021 06:53:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org>, "core-chairs@ietf.org" <core-chairs@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-new-block-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHXQhtQJ0eiusrJ/U2y11QoEHt7QqrWMTfggAeMMqA=
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 04:53:45 +0000
Message-ID: <31572_1620708826_609A0DDA_31572_193_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035382F17@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <162026630680.17506.6477675472375470197@ietfa.amsl.com> <12589_1620322520_609428D8_12589_262_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035377DD2@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <12589_1620322520_609428D8_12589_262_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035377DD2@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/yPBIvIcmFzrInGHjeJ33HOTSGPk>
Subject: Re: [core] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-new-block-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 04:53:56 -0000

Hi Ben, 

It seems that we missed to reply to one of your comments. Please see inline.

Cheers,
Jon & Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : core [mailto:core-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> Envoyé : jeudi 6 mai 2021 19:35
> À : Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>du>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc : draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org; core-chairs@ietf.org;
> core@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [core] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-new-
> block-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> Thank you for the review. All the changes can be tracked at:
> https://tinyurl.com/new-block-latest.
> 
> Please see inline.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jon & Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
> Envoyé :
> > jeudi 6 mai 2021 03:58 À : The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Cc :
> > draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org; core-chairs@ietf.org;
> > core@ietf.org; marco.tiloca@ri.se; marco.tiloca@ri.se Objet :
> Benjamin
> > Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-core-new-block-11:
> > (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> >
[..]
> >
> > %%%
> > The following few comments are interrelated:
> >
> >       This Response Code returned with Content-Type "application/
> >       missing-blocks+cbor-seq" indicates that some of the payloads
> are
> >       missing and need to be resent.  The client then retransmits
> the
> >       missing payloads using the same Request-Tag, Size1 and Q-
> Block1
> > to
> >       specify the block NUM, SZX, and M bit as appropriate.
> >
> > The new 'M' bit is "as appropriate" for the new flight of messages,
> or
> > as was sent initially?  (The examples in §10.x suggest "as was sent
> > initially".)

Yes. We update the text as follows: 

      This Response Code returned with Content-Type "application/
      missing-blocks+cbor-seq" indicates that some of the payloads are
      missing and need to be resent.  The client then retransmits the
      individual missing payloads using the same Request-Tag, Size1,
      and, Q-Block1 Option to specify the same NUM, SZX, and M bit as
      sent initially in the original, but not received, packet.



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.