Re: [core] New Version Notification for draft-bosh-core-new-block-03.txt

[[e-mail]]

Hi Carsten,

I agree that "application/missing-blocks+cbor-seq" is more description. Deal! 

This is now fixed: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bosh-core-new-block-04.

Thanks.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Carsten Bormann [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Envoyé : mercredi 17 juin 2020 15:32
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN
> Cc : [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Objet : Re: [core] New Version Notification for draft-bosh-core-new-block-
> 03.txt
> 
> Quick reply to just this:
> 
> > On 2020-06-17, at 15:18, <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > * A new content format is defined: "application/cbor-seq+block”
> 
> RFC 8742 defines the structured syntax suffix "+cbor-seq”.  As the name
> implies, this comes at the end of the media-type name.  “Block” is OK as a
> prefix, but maybe we find something more descriptive.  Maybe:
> 
> > application/missing-blocks+cbor-seq
> 
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.