IETF Logo Mail Archive

[core] 2018-10-10 virtual interim meeting (Re: Upcoming virtual interim meetings (Re: CoRE@IETF102: Summary))

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 09 October 2018 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77344130DE8 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 14:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mW0x2i3QmlwY for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37267130DC0 for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w99LAmEJ013767 for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 23:10:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.102] (p54A6C3C7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.195.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42V8yw05RmzDX2H; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 23:10:47 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <69826E8F-ABAF-485B-A1A0-EB1843A7104E@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 23:10:47 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 560812245.413831-df6b171831f6bbbe7fa9fd9277826bf9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <47E4B0DB-E8A5-47C0-A275-D889B636BD45@tzi.org>
References: <D9C33C35-5F27-44B8-9431-B68F0BD029B0@tzi.org> <9B5EC459-15BC-45F0-BC6B-0F4C4994AB15@tzi.org> <69826E8F-ABAF-485B-A1A0-EB1843A7104E@tzi.org>
To: Core <core@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/yy9IUOXg_CTRA2EgZ0gNO4OZdMw>
Subject: [core] 2018-10-10 virtual interim meeting (Re: Upcoming virtual interim meetings (Re: CoRE@IETF102: Summary))
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 21:10:55 -0000

On Sep 17, 2018, at 11:13, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> […]
> 2018-10-10 (both chairs present)
> 
> - Objectives: readying drafts for pre-Bangkok WGLCs, specifically:
> 
>   — echo/request-tag — discuss the reviews (we hope to have by then)
>   — multipart-ct: ready to go?
>   - stateless
> 
> — check CORECONF status, Objective: ready remaining documents for WGLC
> 
> - RD interop report (if it already happened) or announcement (if it didn’t)

Is this still the agenda we want to use for tomorrow?

The one additional topic that I’m aware of is the handling of the SMS draft (draft-becker-core-coap-sms-gprs-06.txt):
Do we want to finish that in the WG, or is the WG happy with the authors submitting this as an independent submission RFC?
(The latter was the route we took for RFC 7967, which was a straight CoAP option — is this approach even applicable for the SMS draft?)

> Please send in additional topics (remember that we have only one hour per call, though).
> 
> If you do want to lead a slot, please holler now and send in slides by Monday before the meeting.

That is now getting urgent.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email