IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-06: (with COMMENT)

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Wed, 16 October 2019 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8345120928; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mxaQZCojxmhG; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF92120923; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by opfedar20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 46tWn60H8Fz8tFW; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:28:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.67]) by opfedar02.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 46tWn55zbvzCqkN; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:28:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::b846:2467:1591:5d9d%21]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:28:57 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-core-hop-limit@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-core-hop-limit@ietf.org>, Jaime Jimenez <jaime@iki.fi>, "core-chairs@ietf.org" <core-chairs@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVg6SS0T+9Ozc0T0yVByKY2gJ04KddMxDw
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:28:56 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303133F689@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <157117708870.28091.17993723408155206601.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157117708870.28091.17993723408155206601.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/zPx1CU4js6ncIPeMlobrxrM62no>
Subject: Re: [core] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:29:02 -0000

Hi Barry,

Thank you for the comments. 

Fixed the two nits, and will check the first point. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Barry Leiba via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : mercredi 16 octobre 2019 00:05
> À : The IESG
> Cc : draft-ietf-core-hop-limit@ietf.org; Jaime Jimenez; core-
> chairs@ietf.org; jaime@iki.fi; core@ietf.org
> Objet : Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-06: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-core-hop-limit-06: Yes
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-hop-limit/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks for a simple, yet useful document.  Just some really small nits
> here:
> 
> I wish you had used “that” in most places in the document where “which” is.
> Perhaps the RFC Editor will change those.  If you care to make me happier
> (an
> optional thing, surely), you might change every instance of “which” to
> “that”
> *except* the one in the Abstract (which is correct).
> 
> — Section 3 —
> 
>    Nevertheless, the presence of such proxies will not prevent infinite
>    loop detection if at least one CoAP proxy which support the Hop-Limit
>    option is involved in the loop.
> 
> “support” -> “supports”
> 
>    A CoAP proxy which understands the Hop-Limit option MAY be
>    instructed, using a configuration parameter, to insert a Hop-Limit
>    option when relaying a request which do not include the Hop-Limit
>    option.
> 
> “do not” -> “does not”
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email