[COSE] Consensus Call: Adoption of the COSE Token

Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> Sat, 07 November 2015 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jricher@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094AE1A877D for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 00:02:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32uFlIXq-VFA for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 00:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu [18.9.25.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FAB81A86F5 for <cose@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 00:02:01 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 1209190c-f79c96d00000038e-f6-563daff847cb
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id AB.2A.00910.8FFAD365; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 03:02:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id tA781xZ3021840 for <cose@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 03:01:59 -0500
Received: from [10.21.87.89] ([210.164.9.12]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id tA781tmv002081 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <cose@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 03:01:58 -0500
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B163C432-E13C-4D35-B86B-066C1365232A@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 17:01:53 +0900
To: cose@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrBIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrftjvW2YwYKV3BbTtk5ldWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXRs/uC2wFi7gq9p+dxNjAOJ2ji5GTQ0LARGLy4oVsELaYxIV7 68FsIYHFTBJb36p1MXIB2UcYJXZ072WHcPYySdzb9Z0ZpIpNQFVi+poWJhCbWUBd4s+8S8wQ trbEsoWvwWxhAWOJD2+us4DYvAJWEo9PnAKq5+BgEVCReNFvB2KKCAhK3O00h6jQk3h16zIr xD2yErt/P2KawMg3C8mCWUgWzELSsoCReRWjbEpulW5uYmZOcWqybnFyYl5eapGuoV5uZole akrpJkZwgEny7GB8c1DpEKMAB6MSD++GHzZhQqyJZcWVuYcYJTmYlER5S2Jsw4T4kvJTKjMS izPii0pzUosPMUpwMCuJ8EqsBsrxpiRWVqUW5cOkpDlYlMR5N/3gCxESSE8sSc1OTS1ILYLJ ynBwKEnwBqwDahQsSk1PrUjLzClBSDNxcIIM5wEa/nItyPDigsTc4sx0iPwpRkUpcd5kkGYB kERGaR5cLygBXFrCyfOKURzoFWHeSSBVPMDkAdf9CmgwE9BghygbkMEliQgpqQZG/ebL9/t7 u8VV296+fpH9K4F5iqNzFbvF6enpaTuSwvd1HXr8Ylapt5lZztZj4Qap4U5LNnjIXvPMnls6 S2emcO2maB7VGmbpnaflu70DxNgezmwxVFZ+kcVfOSP9xuJ1vvee3vmSGfFyh+feyd/vv+dz tJp1SFIktT7AW+Tw82N3Nz5e9vmJEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAZLvr9NsCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/1O0S1Y1BfX_5TtaDkGOsN5fPIbk>
Subject: [COSE] Consensus Call: Adoption of the COSE Token
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 08:02:03 -0000

At the Yokohama meeting, the chairs agreed to do a consensus call regarding the adoption and placement of new work to define a COSE Token, analogous to the JWT from JOSE. In the room, there was a general sentiment of support for the work being done, with the wide adoption of JWT and its driving of JOSE being a common theme of precedent. What wasn’t clear is where the work should be done and to what end it should drive. The six positions we are asking the working group to consider and voice their support for are:

A) Define the COSE Token within the COSE working group along side the COSE Messages (and potentially COSE Auxiliary Algorithms) draft.
B) Define the COSE Token inside the OAuth working group.
C) Define the COSE Token inside the ACE working group.
D) Don’t define the COSE Token anywhere.
E) You need more information to decide.
F) You don’t give a flying rat about the COSE Token.*

The consensus call will remain open for two weeks from today, closing on November 21, 2015; at which time, hopefully we will have a clear answer and direction to point this work.

Thank you,
 — Justin & Kepeng, your COSE chairs

* I promised those in the room at Yokohama to offer a flying rat option, for which I am deeply sorry.