Re: [COSE] Consensus Call: Adoption of the COSE Token

[Ludwig Seitz <[e-mail]>]

On 2015-11-07 09:01, Justin Richer wrote:
> At the Yokohama meeting, the chairs agreed to do a consensus call
> regarding the adoption and placement of new work to define a COSE
> Token, analogous to the JWT from JOSE. In the room, there was a
> general sentiment of support for the work being done, with the wide
> adoption of JWT and its driving of JOSE being a common theme of
> precedent. What wasn’t clear is where the work should be done and to
> what end it should drive. The six positions we are asking the working
> group to consider and voice their support for are:

> A) Define the COSE Token within the COSE working group along side the COSE Messages (and potentially COSE Auxiliary Algorithms) draft.
> B) Define the COSE Token inside the OAuth working group.
> C) Define the COSE Token inside the ACE working group.
> D) Don’t define the COSE Token anywhere.
> E) You need more information to decide.
> F) You don’t give a flying rat about the COSE Token.*
>


C)

Both A) and B) would require rechartering, I believe we can get away 
with the CWT in C) without rechartering.

I think we need to have both ACE and OAuth expertise on this. 
Furthermore we need to integrate this with the other ACE work, which is 
why I think C) is the right choice.

/Ludwig

-- 
Ludwig Seitz, PhD
SICS Swedish ICT AB
Ideon Science Park
Building Beta 2
Scheelevägen 17
SE-223 70 Lund

Phone [phone]
http://www.sics.se