Re: [COSE] RFC 8152 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 05 July 2017 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B506131D9E for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z83-xfb0ZjJ6 for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98C48131442 for <cose@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v65IaPwN020390 for <cose@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 20:36:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DC7F3A7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.243.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3x2qMY2X5cz3bBw; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 20:36:25 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170705181605.29A05B81904@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 20:36:23 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 520972583.785324-1e5e97f471191ff85c1d098d088f3791
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8B866506-E4AA-4EB6-B942-E24CC0AB2236@tzi.org>
References: <20170705181605.29A05B81904@rfc-editor.org>
To: cose <cose@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/4en1sEb3k_UuHrDsuoS5QGOSPxQ>
Subject: Re: [COSE] RFC 8152 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 18:36:30 -0000

Congratulations, Jim!

This has been a long time coming, and I started to think we might never touch the asymptote…
But it is done now, and now we can charge forward with CWT and related documents, but also with specialized protocols such as SWORN.

Thank you to everybody who helped make this happen!

Grüße, Carsten


> On Jul 5, 2017, at 20:16, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
> 
>        RFC 8152
> 
>        Title:      CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) 
>        Author:     J. Schaad
>        Status:     Standards Track
>        Stream:     IETF
>        Date:       July 2017
>        Mailbox:    ietf@augustcellars.com
>        Pages:      121
>        Characters: 256190
>        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
> 
>        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-cose-msg-24.txt
> 
>        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8152
> 
>        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8152
> 
> Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is a data format designed
> for small code size and small message size.  There is a need for the
> ability to have basic security services defined for this data format.
> This document defines the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)
> protocol.  This specification describes how to create and process
> signatures, message authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR
> for serialization.  This specification additionally describes how to
> represent cryptographic keys using CBOR.
> 
> This document is a product of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> This is now a Proposed Standard.
> 
> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
> protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
> for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
> Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
> standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
> memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
> 
> 
>