Re: [COSE] draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-algs and deterministic ECDSA recommendations

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 16 February 2021 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A6E3A0B60 for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 04:50:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gbd-aARJ-AVR for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 04:50:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC003A0B70 for <cose@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 04:50:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Dg16P1W8kzybL; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:50:37 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <6E2EBFD1-A226-455B-8E64-1DF735AE97C5@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:50:36 +0100
Cc: "cose@ietf.org" <cose@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 635172636.478983-11769dc5177453edd661c6d64123992f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <644999F2-DF4A-4B10-A470-3B56066110DA@tzi.org>
References: <6E2EBFD1-A226-455B-8E64-1DF735AE97C5@ericsson.com>
To: John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/9qYq9vXDexBrt4anqBi_6DsQFgE>
Subject: Re: [COSE] draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-algs and deterministic ECDSA recommendations
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:50:42 -0000

On 2021-02-16, at 13:17, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Recommending deterministic ECDSA for IoT devices without any security considerations would not be good.

+1

Grüße, Carsten