Re: [COSE] questions for the WG from 8152bis AUTH48

Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> Fri, 18 February 2022 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131D53A12CF for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:36:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E7eh9ZqQZcUC for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from welho-filter1.welho.com (welho-filter1b.welho.com [83.102.41.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CA463A1336 for <cose@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter1.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCA622181 for <cose@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 20:36:48 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp1.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.84]) by localhost (welho-filter1.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.23]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwkduAggZ0Kv for <cose@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 20:36:47 +0200 (EET)
Received: from LK-Perkele-VII2 (87-92-216-160.rev.dnainternet.fi [87.92.216.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp1.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E71627A for <cose@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 20:36:46 +0200 (EET)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 20:36:46 +0200
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
To: cose@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Yg/nPjgUGZa4DeIg@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald>
References: <20220218045949.GN12881@kduck.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220218045949.GN12881@kduck.mit.edu>
Sender: ilariliusvaara@welho.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/F-0ZR6ExgrkODvakCKvW-HbY2D8>
Subject: Re: [COSE] questions for the WG from 8152bis AUTH48
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 18:36:54 -0000

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:59:49PM -0800, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The chairs and I are continuing to work through the AUTH48 process for the
> 8152bis drafts, and a couple topics have come up that would benefit from
> some broader input.
> 
> The other question is in -algs; in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-algs#section-8

On -algs, looks like table 16 in section 6.4.1. is inconsistent about
the KDF used. The KDF field lists HKDF, but description says Concat
KDF. I believe the HKDF is correct. This has then gotten copied into
the IANA registry, except the IANA registry does not seem to have the
KDF column, so IANA registry claims those codepoints are using Concat
KDF, which I do not think is correct.



-Ilari