IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [COSE] [Rats] RAM requirements for COSE/CWT

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 21 February 2022 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC433A0147; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:31:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PYiq8_NHnnFj; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5C393A012A; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:31:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4K2STy6kkvzDCcj; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:31:02 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <1a16c80d-40cd-baba-b1ce-2033dd0db294@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:31:02 +0100
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>, "cose@ietf.org" <cose@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 667153862.2406811-30725f304098cb35e1d854f0d4f07bcc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D22D0D63-F76C-48B3-A034-F8B5B2BB6005@tzi.org>
References: <e8995f0c-ad85-f702-da6b-051ffdc4cb08@gmail.com> <DBBPR08MB5915B874FD16107A7B0105AAFA3A9@DBBPR08MB5915.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <1a16c80d-40cd-baba-b1ce-2033dd0db294@gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/J4mrw7cAGIzm421l24FD9RCN7Wc>
Subject: Re: [COSE] [Rats] RAM requirements for COSE/CWT
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:31:13 -0000

On 2022-02-21, at 17:15, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I couldn't find any valid reason for using JSON

We seem to have found an area where we agree :-)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email