MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <175985791148.4101714.17514903715253024141@dt-datatracker-6c6cdf7f94-h6rnn>
In-Reply-To: 
 <175985791148.4101714.17514903715253024141@dt-datatracker-6c6cdf7f94-h6rnn>
From: Orie <orie@or13.io>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 08:43:23 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAMzqgow-Lk_oNvgXOjJvBhj2CBEWMfdwMPrDG58t95irorFHQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007be8b90640e2380e"
Message-ID-Hash: MS5NXFI66LAZUP3S3CC2PZYU55X474XP
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-cose-dilithium@ietf.org,
 cose-chairs@ietf.org, cose@ietf.org, lucas.prabel@huawei.com
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCOSE=5D_Re=3A_Roman_Danyliw=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf-cose?=
 =?utf-8?q?-dilithium-09=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/oU2f2LEpdzGHSunUPIuDfK-815w>

--0000000000007be8b90640e2380e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Roman,

I've addressed your feedback along with other IESG comments here:

https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium/pull/26

Please let me know if I missed anything.

Inline for the rest.


On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:25=E2=80=AFPM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positio=
ns/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you to Russ Housley for the GENART review.
>
> ** Editorial.  A number of references in the document are not formal
> references.  For example:
>
> -- Section 4, =E2=80=9CFIPS 204=E2=80=9D vs. =E2=80=9C[FIPS 204]=E2=80=9D=
 (multiple instances)
>

I think I fixed all these.


>
> -- Section 8.1.1, =E2=80=9CRFC 9053 and RFC 9054=E2=80=9D vs. =E2=80=9C[R=
FC9053] and [RFC9054]=E2=80=9D
> (multiple instances)
>

I addressed this.


>
> ** Section 8.1.1.* -- Why is the change control entity specific named
> here, but
> it is in the JOSE registrations?
>

Good catch, probably a copy paste error on my side.


>
> ** Section 8.1.4.4.*  -- These registration have a row with =E2=80=9CValu=
e
> registry:
> [IANA.jose] Algorithms=E2=80=9D.  That is not in the RFC7518 template or =
in the
> production
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/jose/jose.xhtml#web-signature-encryption=
-algorithms
> registry
>

Another good catch, I have corrected this.

--0000000000007be8b90640e2380e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hi Roman,<br><br>I&#39;ve addressed your =
feedback=C2=A0along with other IESG comments here:<br><br><a href=3D"https:=
//github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium/pull/26">https://github.com/=
cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium/pull/26</a><br><br>Please let me know if =
I missed=C2=A0anything.<br><br>Inline for the rest.<br><br></div><br><div c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_=
attr">On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:25=E2=80=AFPM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker=
 &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:noreply@ietf.org">noreply@ietf.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br=
></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;=
border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Roman Danyliw has =
entered the following ballot position for<br>
draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-09: No Objection<br>
<br>
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all<br>
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this<br>
introductory paragraph, however.)<br>
<br>
<br>
Please refer to <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statement=
s/handling-ballot-positions/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://=
www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/</a> <b=
r>
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.<br>
<br>
<br>
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:<br>
<a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium/" rel=
=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ie=
tf-cose-dilithium/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
COMMENT:<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Thank you to Russ Housley for the GENART review.<br>
<br>
** Editorial.=C2=A0 A number of references in the document are not formal<b=
r>
references.=C2=A0 For example:<br>
<br>
-- Section 4, =E2=80=9CFIPS 204=E2=80=9D vs. =E2=80=9C[FIPS 204]=E2=80=9D (=
multiple instances)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I think I fixed all=
 these.<br>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0p=
x 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
-- Section 8.1.1, =E2=80=9CRFC 9053 and RFC 9054=E2=80=9D vs. =E2=80=9C[RFC=
9053] and [RFC9054]=E2=80=9D<br>
(multiple instances)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I addressed this.<=
/div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px=
 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
** Section 8.1.1.* -- Why is the change control entity specific named here,=
 but<br>
it is in the JOSE registrations?<br></blockquote><div><br>Good catch, proba=
bly a copy paste error on my side.<br>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmai=
l_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,20=
4,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
** Section 8.1.4.4.*=C2=A0 -- These registration have a row with =E2=80=9CV=
alue registry:<br>
[IANA.jose] Algorithms=E2=80=9D.=C2=A0 That is not in the RFC7518 template =
or in the<br>
production<br>
<a href=3D"https://www.iana.org/assignments/jose/jose.xhtml#web-signature-e=
ncryption-algorithms" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://www.iana=
.org/assignments/jose/jose.xhtml#web-signature-encryption-algorithms</a><br=
>
registry<br></blockquote><div><br>Another good catch, I have corrected this=
.=C2=A0</div></div></div>

--0000000000007be8b90640e2380e--