IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [COSE] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-x509-07: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 22 October 2020 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFFC3A0EC7; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S27gurA5ydam; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 620BD3A0957; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 09MFNT9G020903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:23:34 -0400
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:23:29 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io>
Cc: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Cose Chairs Wg <cose-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-cose-x509@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, cose <cose@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20201022152329.GB39170@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <160313511018.7246.11234492090901667420@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAJFkdRwmirpsFDStoBzapGB=hn-+98_ShPT2DE_oz9-LK=prXA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJFkdRwmirpsFDStoBzapGB=hn-+98_ShPT2DE_oz9-LK=prXA@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/qYkms2KEZQbfJtBKRoFnaGU7ILE>
Subject: Re: [COSE] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-x509-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:23:41 -0000

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 08:28:26AM +0300, Ivaylo Petrov wrote:
> Thank you Robert for your review! From this discussion [1] it appears that
> indeed the intention of the usage of the term bag was not to make any
> assumptions about the uniqueness of the elements. I am taking a note to
> make that clear in the document regardless of the conclusion of that
> discussion.
> 
> [1]: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/VLv2E6wcGkC4YY-vFMRxnEAXrXo/

There is also some precedent for the use of "bag" for this type of thing;
consider, e.g., https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7292#section-4.2.3 .

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email