Re: [COSE] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cose-webauthn-algorithms-05.txt> (COSE and JOSE Registrations for WebAuthn Algorithms) to Proposed Standard

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 23 May 2020 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D8C3A0E9B; Sat, 23 May 2020 13:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kkbeER2rQIZJ; Sat, 23 May 2020 13:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F8A3A0E98; Sat, 23 May 2020 13:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04NKRf94023675; Sat, 23 May 2020 21:29:31 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=egQEgGthO0JO0P7gMr0E6QMpuVBEXWiNdNW9zKf4CuI=; b=CT4qZXRV4t2uqE7+qql2ia+OV+B6zL9Gq2ZlkqXFOURmF1WTTn6F9ixgDkcGZO6kvElt YgJmPNsYFl30/7TKixmpzmHlfA5/6brg4n01HenRNAUd1lv3WVgasGPsqKpKasC0jU9p A8NEWKW6wYCDYyDv1Db0OI3A9pMYr6CYKWL30QftU+BPEKrxDBbf/YbAhd1JW6w7OVnI c3WTbcZxDn/fSuttIgk6YIuszvaU/fZXPe2Km8yu2aFyLV62QN0VHfa5F04lMutu/qaW QkngyLbRDoxSGpASIRnza7Z1CJhsVDftuon7rAsPo0+v7c35wwfNJU7gdTNYRGphjRWt Ig==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (a72-247-45-33.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.33] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 316uc5sj4m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 23 May 2020 21:29:31 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 04NKHBhj004843; Sat, 23 May 2020 16:29:30 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.113]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com with ESMTP id 31769hgt2a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 23 May 2020 16:29:30 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 23 May 2020 15:29:29 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Sat, 23 May 2020 15:29:29 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
CC: "cose@ietf.org" <cose@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Last-Call] [COSE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cose-webauthn-algorithms-05.txt> (COSE and JOSE Registrations for WebAuthn Algorithms) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHWKSO8GkLpAcgy2ECtMYl4VbAJrai1U6sAgADshwA=
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 20:29:29 +0000
Message-ID: <C22C1334-F8C1-4F19-9381-2C5585F9E41A@akamai.com>
References: <158937361695.30811.14534799425984840549@ietfa.amsl.com> <027401d630a9$12fa2d00$38ee8700$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <027401d630a9$12fa2d00$38ee8700$@augustcellars.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.133]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <199B2584F784F94A890A076C82D84C16@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-23_12:2020-05-22, 2020-05-23 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=709 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2004280000 definitions=main-2005230171
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-23_12:2020-05-22, 2020-05-23 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=696 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005230172
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/qmIcDI5cGRQII2LpeKjZsWtV_-w>
Subject: Re: [COSE] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cose-webauthn-algorithms-05.txt> (COSE and JOSE Registrations for WebAuthn Algorithms) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 20:29:40 -0000

>    I believe that the IESG needs to debate if this document should be the one
    which makes the secp256k1 curve a recommended IETF curve to use.

A good point, albeit slightly subtle.  +1.