Re: Syntax

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 08 January 2007 09:32 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H3qs6-00067s-O5; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:32:50 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H3qs5-00067j-TA for cosmogol@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:32:49 -0500
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H3qs3-0005qR-GB for cosmogol@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:32:49 -0500
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jan 2007 09:32:46 -0000
Received: from p508FB0E6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.22]) [80.143.176.230] by mail.gmx.net (mp042) with SMTP; 08 Jan 2007 10:32:46 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
Message-ID: <45A20FBA.4070701@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:32:42 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
References: <45A129E9.50905@gmx.de> <20070107205841.GB14621@sources.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070107205841.GB14621@sources.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Cc: cosmogol@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Syntax
X-BeenThere: cosmogol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: DIscussion on state machine specification in IETF protocols <cosmogol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/cosmogol>
List-Post: <mailto:cosmogol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cosmogol-bounces@ietf.org

Stephane Bortzmeyer schrieb:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:12:09PM +0100,
>  Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote 
>  a message of 31 lines which said:
> 
>> 3) Although a "compact" syntax is great for readability, 
> 
> And authorship, IMHO.

Yep.

>> an alternate syntax in XML would be good for usage within XML tool
>> chains.
> 
> It is certainly a good idea. What do you think of having an alternate
> *non-normative* XML format, with the same terminology and data model
> as the compact syntax? A tool like Shadok could certainly translate
>>from one syntax to another.

Exactly what I was thinking about.

>> (if there's interest in that, I'll happily contribute).
> 
> Please proceed, as long as it is in Relax NG :-)

Yes, I also like XML Schema languages, as long as they don't come from 
the W3C :-).

Best regards, Julian



_______________________________________________
Cosmogol mailing list
Cosmogol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol