Re: Syntax
Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Wed, 10 January 2007 21:10 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4kih-0002ZL-5y; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:10:51 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4kig-0002ZB-0q for cosmogol@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:10:50 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4kie-0000P2-DY for cosmogol@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:10:50 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H4kiI-0000lU-7A for cosmogol@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:10:27 +0100
Received: from du-001-151.access.de.clara.net ([212.82.227.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <cosmogol@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:10:26 +0100
Received: from nobody by du-001-151.access.de.clara.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <cosmogol@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:10:26 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cosmogol@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:09:05 +0100
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <45A555F1.3286@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <45A129E9.50905@gmx.de> <20070107205255.GA14621@sources.org> <45A20F62.9060306@gmx.de> <20070108204618.GA29407@sources.org> <20070109000704.GB17340@finch-staff-1.thus.net> <20070109081753.GA1875@nic.fr> <20070110055950.GA5608@finch-staff-1.thus.net> <45A512E8.25CC@xyzzy.claranet.de> <45A514D6.7030000@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: du-001-151.access.de.clara.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Subject: Re: Syntax
X-BeenThere: cosmogol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: DIscussion on state machine specification in IETF protocols <cosmogol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/cosmogol>
List-Post: <mailto:cosmogol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cosmogol-bounces@ietf.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > What does this have to do with XML 1.1? Or with XML at all? XML 1.1 and 1.0 differ wrt to attribute names and other identifiers. IIRC, I'm too lazy to check this now (but if you want me I'd try) >> It should work with any parser on any platform, including MS DOS >> before 3.2 or the BASIC interpreter written by Bill Gates 198? >> under CP/M. :-( > Where did you get that requirement from? Looking at my own OS/2 box without UTF-8 I got an old gawk and REXX to implement this. We'd want to transform the state machines into other languages for presentation etc., for that we need KISS, and no obscure escape mechanisms requiring native Unicode support. On GMaNe the descricption for this list is: "About languages for state machines in RFCs, especially Cosmogol". RFCs are plain text US ASCII at the moment, and they always were. At some point in time that will change, but not _here_ and _now_ > if the language allows textual content (such as comments), it > should better handle non-ASCII characters Together with ABNF and similar constructs. In the same way as it's done there. Not in some ad hoc backslash notation borrowed from C, or the 􃑖 in RFC 4646, we'd want exactly the same solution as for among others ABNF comments. Without a crystal ball we can't tell what this will be - I guess it won't be the C or RFC 4646 notation, but native UTF-8. Frank _______________________________________________ Cosmogol mailing list Cosmogol@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol
- Syntax Julian Reschke
- Re: Syntax Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Syntax Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Syntax Julian Reschke
- Re: Syntax Julian Reschke
- Re: Syntax Cullen Jennings
- Re: Syntax Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Syntax Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: Syntax Julian Reschke
- Re: Syntax Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Syntax Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Syntax Julian Reschke
- Re: Syntax Frank Ellermann
- Re: Syntax Julian Reschke
- Re: Syntax Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Syntax Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: Syntax Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Syntax Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Syntax Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: Syntax Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: Syntax Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: Syntax Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: Syntax Frank Ellermann
- Re: Syntax Frank Ellermann
- Re: Syntax Julian Reschke
- Re: Syntax Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: Syntax Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: Syntax Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Syntax Julian Reschke
- Re: Syntax Frank Ellermann
- Re: Syntax Frank Ellermann
- Re: Syntax Frank Ellermann
- Re: Syntax Julian Reschke
- Re: Syntax Julian Reschke
- OT: ABNF (was: Syntax) Frank Ellermann
- Re: Syntax Frank Ellermann
- Re: Syntax Frank Ellermann
- Re: OT: ABNF Julian Reschke
- Re: OT: ABNF Frank Ellermann
- Re: OT: ABNF Julian Reschke
- Re: Syntax Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: Syntax Julian Reschke
- Unicode identifiers in other RFCs (Was: Syntax Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Unicode identifiers in other RFCs Frank Ellermann
- Jabber room for BoF in Prague (Was: Unicode ident… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Jabber room for BoF in Prague (Was: Unicode i… Stephane Bortzmeyer