Re: Request for workers :-)

Hi Stephane,

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Thanks to everybody who joined the list and Happy New Year for those
> who are now in 2007 (yes, I know there are other calendars, although
> there is no IANA registry for them).
> 
> Since one of the first aims of this list was to test wether or not
> there was sufficient interest for the IETF to dedicate a BoF and may
> be a working group to it, I would like to check if some people here are
> ready to work on Comosgol. I do not ask if you're interested (I assume
> that subscribing to the list is a proof of interest) but if you can
> dedicate human resources on tasks like:
> 
> * working on the Internet-Draft,

Yes.  I'll repost in this mailing-list the comments I sent you in private.

> 
> * working on the current implementation, Shadok, or on another one
> (having two different implementations would certainly be a good
> thing),

I cannot code in Haskell, but I packaged Shadok for the Debian GNU/Linux
 distribution (i386 and amd64).  I am just waiting for a version number
to upload them on a public repository...

> 
> * proofreading,
> 
> * writing state machines in Cosmogol (with an emphasis on state
> machines used in RFC) to stress the language and feel its limits,

I started to convert in Cosmogol the state machines in RFC 3261.  I also
have somewhere the state machine for draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-05.

Do you plan to have some sort of repository of Cosmogol state machines
for IETF protocols publicly available?

> 
> * studying in depth the "competitors" like SDL / Z100 to report about
> wether or not they would be a better match for the IETF and why.

-- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Home: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Work: marc@8x8.com

_______________________________________________
Cosmogol mailing list
Cosmogol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol