IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Syntax

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 10 January 2007 16:36 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4gRP-0001nd-GD; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:36:43 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4gRO-0001nU-90 for cosmogol@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:36:42 -0500
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4gRN-0000GZ-0Y for cosmogol@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:36:42 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6011526C1FC; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:36:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mx2.nic.fr
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A998B26C1F9; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:36:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D15C58ED21; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:36:37 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:36:37 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20070110163637.GA6966@nic.fr>
References: <45A129E9.50905@gmx.de> <20070107205255.GA14621@sources.org> <45A20F62.9060306@gmx.de> <20070108204618.GA29407@sources.org> <20070109000704.GB17340@finch-staff-1.thus.net> <20070109081753.GA1875@nic.fr> <20070110055950.GA5608@finch-staff-1.thus.net> <45A512E8.25CC@xyzzy.claranet.de> <45A514D6.7030000@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45A514D6.7030000@gmx.de>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Cc: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>, cosmogol@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Syntax
X-BeenThere: cosmogol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: DIscussion on state machine specification in IETF protocols <cosmogol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/cosmogol>
List-Post: <mailto:cosmogol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cosmogol-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:31:18PM +0100,
 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote 
 a message of 25 lines which said:

> Where did you get that requirement from?

Until now, and at least until a formal WG is formed, we have no real
requirments, just personal opinions. Discussing them is welcome.


_______________________________________________
Cosmogol mailing list
Cosmogol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email