IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Syntax of transitions

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 09 January 2007 22:12 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4PCZ-0007ly-8Y; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:12:15 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4PCX-0007jd-Q6 for cosmogol@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:12:13 -0500
Received: from virtual3.netaktiv.com ([80.67.170.53] helo=mail.bortzmeyer.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4PCW-000568-IP for cosmogol@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:12:13 -0500
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 4A3B6240825; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:12:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91E4711B4A; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:10:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:10:42 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive@demon.net>
Message-ID: <20070109221042.GC28340@sources.org>
References: <20070108162900.GA66689@finch-staff-1.thus.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070108162900.GA66689@finch-staff-1.thus.net>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Cc: IETF Cosmogol list <cosmogol@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Syntax of transitions
X-BeenThere: cosmogol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: DIscussion on state machine specification in IETF protocols <cosmogol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/cosmogol>
List-Post: <mailto:cosmogol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cosmogol-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 04:29:00PM +0000,
 Clive D.W. Feather <clive@demon.net> wrote 
 a message of 78 lines which said:

> Secondly, is there any reason to forbid multiple actions?

No, no good reasons, and protocols like SIP or SCTP really need
multiple actions.


_______________________________________________
Cosmogol mailing list
Cosmogol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email