Re: Syntax

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 09 January 2007 08:24 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4CH8-0000hf-Tk; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:24:06 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4CH8-0000hZ-D8 for cosmogol@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:24:06 -0500
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4CH6-00047J-4R for cosmogol@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:24:06 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EC926C23E; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:24:03 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mx2.nic.fr
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067F426C234; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:24:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED15058EBC3; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:24:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:24:02 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20070109082402.GA4968@nic.fr>
References: <45A129E9.50905@gmx.de> <20070107205255.GA14621@sources.org> <45A20F62.9060306@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45A20F62.9060306@gmx.de>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: cosmogol@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Syntax
X-BeenThere: cosmogol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: DIscussion on state machine specification in IETF protocols <cosmogol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/cosmogol>
List-Post: <mailto:cosmogol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cosmogol-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:31:14AM +0100,
 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote 
 a message of 43 lines which said:

> I think inventing a new format, but not taking I18N is very hard to
> defend. As far as I can tell, there's no real chance to get it
> published.

Any pointer on such regulations? Presently, I know:

RFC 2277 / BCP 18 IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages

RFC 2223 Instructions to RFC Authors

RFC 3536 Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF

But none seems to back up your claim.

(In the same way that no document seems to mandate that the RFC be
written in English: I'll translate the draft to French tomorrow.)

_______________________________________________
Cosmogol mailing list
Cosmogol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol