[Crisp] Status Code DREG2 -> DCHK
Bernie Hoeneisen <bhoeneis@switch.ch> Wed, 22 March 2006 22:39 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMBzj-0008Qd-Hd; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:39:59 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMBzh-0008QR-Km for crisp@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:39:57 -0500
Received: from central.switch.ch ([130.59.11.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMBzg-00069b-Bs for crisp@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:39:57 -0500
Received: from machb.switch.ch ([130.59.6.129]) by central.switch.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FMBze-0005Ln-00 for crisp@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:39:55 +0100
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:39:43 +0100
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bhoeneis@switch.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@machb
To: crisp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603222337510.19480@machb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Subject: [Crisp] Status Code DREG2 -> DCHK
X-BeenThere: crisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cross Registry Information Service Protocol <crisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp>, <mailto:crisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:crisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp>, <mailto:crisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: crisp-bounces@ietf.org
Hi! During today's CRISP WG meeting we had a brief discussion about dependencies between DREG2 and DCHK(2) concerning status codes. (We have a requirement for a status code 'reserved' in DCHK-like services, i.e. a domain name (name of a city) is free, but can only be registered by corresponding city.) The question was, whether DCHK should reflect the new status codes introduced in DREG2, or whether it makes more sense to put this into possible DCHK2 work. We discussed this again after the meeting among Andy, Ted, April, and myself. Conclusion: As DCHK is not likey to be revised for other reasons than this, I should send this "as a delayed WG Last Call comment" to the list, and Andy will change this in the DCHK draft (unless there something serious in the way preventing him from doing this...;-) ) cheers, Bernie _______________________________________________ Crisp mailing list Crisp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp
- [Crisp] Status Code DREG2 -> DCHK Bernie Hoeneisen