Re: [Crisp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-crisp-iris-xpc-03.txt

On Mar 22, 2006, at 5:05 PM, Robert Martin-Legene wrote:

> BTW, is it a problem to mention SASL PLAIN when RFC2595 is for "IMAP,
> POP3 and ACAP"?  Section 6 paragraph 2 of the RFC does actually say
> "This defines the "PLAIN" SASL mechanism for use with ACAP and other
> protocols with no clear-text login command.". So maybe it's ok? Btw,
> it's not in the references either, so maybe I'm just barking up the
> wrong tree.

At the time this draft was written, the new SASL PLAIN draft was not  
done and the normative reference to SASL PLAIN is 2595.  Other  
protocols have done this too.  Since I have to respin this draft,  
I'll check to see if the reference has changed to the new document  
that pulls SASL PLAIN out of IMAP.

-andy