Re: [Crisp] Questions re adoption and future of IRIS protocol and IRIS dependent services

Carl,

> COMMERCIAL IMPLEMENTATIONS: Marcos Sanz reports that DENIC will make
> available

For the records this will be no "commercial" implementation. You can call 
it "closed" implementation, if you want.

> 3) Marcos and Sven-Holger, could you please make more explicit the 
complete
> list of IRIS related RFC standards that your companies will be 
supporting
> with products or services?

As I said, this is a DCHK implementation (RFC number not known yet) over 
LWZ transport (RFC 4993).

> This inquiry regards solely the status of RFC 3982 and the fact that the
> formal XML syntax for dreg1 does not validate. Specifically, XML 
validation
> checkers return errors that map to lines beginning with the element
> 'dreg:endsWith'.

RFC errata is to be reported as follows:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/how_to_report.html

Andy or I will gladly verify any errors in the schemata.

> (1) For active members of the CRISP WG, what is the current 
recommendation
> for use of a corrected revision for dreg?

Implement RFC 3982 plus verified errata.

Best regards,
Marcos

_______________________________________________
Crisp mailing list
Crisp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp