Re: [Crisp] new status for DREG2

Andrew Newton wrote:
> I had a meeting with an sTLD operator last week where it was brought to
> my attention that they would like to mark domains with a status
> indicating compliance with regulations not directly related to the
> actual domain registration process... as in, they have conducted a
> compliance check and have found that a domain holder's web site meets
> certain accessibility requirements or internationalization requirements,
> etc...
> 
> To do what they would like, I think we should add a <compliant:> and
> <noncompliant> enhanced status to the base enhanced status set in
> DREG2.  The substatus and related authority would indicate the type of
> compliance.

That looks to me like some "validation status" - might be very similar to
what is used in ENUM.

Any chance to recycly valdationEvents from EREG here?

cheers

alex

_______________________________________________
Crisp mailing list
Crisp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp