Re: [Crisp] RFC 3982 dreg1 error report
Marcos Sanz/Denic <sanz@denic.de> Tue, 29 January 2008 16:23 UTC
Return-path: <crisp-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJtFJ-0005M2-UZ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:23:37 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJtFJ-0005Kc-9H for crisp@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:23:37 -0500
Received: from smtp.denic.de ([81.91.161.3]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJtFI-0007GG-Tf for crisp@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:23:37 -0500
Received: from notes.rz.denic.de ([192.168.0.77]) by smtp.denic.de with esmtp id 1JJtFH-0007Cn-IK; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:23:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <003101c861f2$a0988870$e1c99950$@net>
To: ctaswell@telegenetics.net
Subject: Re: [Crisp] RFC 3982 dreg1 error report
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0.2 September 26, 2006
From: Marcos Sanz/Denic <sanz@denic.de>
Message-ID: <OF93436913.2EB0C901-ONC12573DF.0059788F-C12573DF.005A0941@notes.denic.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:23:26 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes/Denic at 29.01.2008 17:23:35, Serialize complete at 29.01.2008 17:23:35
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: crisp@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: crisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cross Registry Information Service Protocol <crisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp>, <mailto:crisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:crisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp>, <mailto:crisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: crisp-bounces@ietf.org
Carl, > dreg1.xsd could not be validated because of an error in XML Schema/DTD (see > below) > Element 'dreg:endsWith' is not consistent with element > 'dreg:endsWith' > > Please advise on recommended corrections for a revised version of dreg. thanks for bringing this out to our attention. The reason for that message is that the current definition of the group "partialMatchGroup" in dreg1.xsd violates the rule of consistent element declaration: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028/#cos-element-consistent I have just submitted the erratum to the RFC editor together with a suggested correction: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3982 Thanks again and best regards, Marcos _______________________________________________ Crisp mailing list Crisp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp
- [Crisp] RFC 3982 dreg1 error report Carl Taswell
- Re: [Crisp] RFC 3982 dreg1 error report Marcos Sanz/Denic
- Re: [Crisp] RFC 3982 dreg1 error report Andrew Newton
- RE: [Crisp] RFC 3982 dreg1 error report Carl Taswell