IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Crisp] Nit in lwz-05

Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br> Tue, 25 April 2006 14:14 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYOIy-0004sH-CO; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:14:16 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYOIx-0004sB-OW for crisp@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:14:15 -0400
Received: from clone.registro.br ([200.160.2.4]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYOIw-0002El-EN for crisp@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:14:15 -0400
Received: by clone.registro.br (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3F7D82A559; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:14:12 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:14:12 -0300
From: Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br>
To: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Subject: Re: [Crisp] Nit in lwz-05
Message-ID: <20060425141412.GA95476@registro.br>
Mail-Followup-To: Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br>, Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>, Marcos Sanz/Denic <sanz@denic.de>, crisp@ietf.org
References: <OF680C6E97.16161DB3-ONC1257157.002CFDD6-C1257157.002D9E72@notes.denic.de> <444E20D4.10502@hxr.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <444E20D4.10502@hxr.us>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Cc: Marcos Sanz/Denic <sanz@denic.de>, crisp@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: crisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cross Registry Information Service Protocol <crisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp>, <mailto:crisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:crisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp>, <mailto:crisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: crisp-bounces@ietf.org

We raised this privately to Andy when implementing our prototype.

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:15:00AM -0400, Andrew Newton wrote:
> Marcos Sanz/Denic wrote:
> >Dear list,
> >
> >while implementing LWZ (yes, you heard it right ;-) we have realized that 
> >the figure in section 3 tags "payload descriptor" with "3..261" octets.
> >
> >It should be "6..261" as of section 3.1.1
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Marcos
> 
> Who keeps putting bugs in these documents? :)
> 

We :-)

For requests the range is "6..261", but for responses the value is 3.

So "6..261" would invalidate any response.

If possible the more correct version would be [ 3 or 6..261 ]

> -andy

Fred

_______________________________________________
Crisp mailing list
Crisp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email