Re: IPv7 Selection Criteria

[William Allen Simpson <[e-mail]>]

> Hence, let me suggest explicitly distinguishing those criteria that
> have clinical benefit, but lack objective assessment, from those
> whose assessment can be made mechanical.  The clinical criteria could
> be in their own section, some sort of qualification explaining why they
> are included and how they should be used.
>
> Whatcha tink?
>

YES!

Add extensible, since the appearance of extensibility doesn't mean that
we will have any greater luck in migrating to the extended format than
we have of migrating this time.

Any claim of extensibility would have to show that there would be *NO*
negative effect when such a mechanism is added.  That is, a packet
either with or without an option would still reach the destination
eventually, just not necessarily with the guaranteed flow, for example.

[e-mail]