What real users want most

Michael Davis <mad@spirit.clearpoint.com> Thu, 28 January 1993 15:42 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05934; 28 Jan 93 10:42 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05921; 28 Jan 93 10:42 EST
Received: from babyoil.ftp.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13496; 28 Jan 93 10:44 EST
Received: from [131.226.1.88] by ftp.com with SMTP id AA15095; Thu, 28 Jan 93 10:36:37 -0500
Received: by spirit.clearpoint.com (4.1/1.34) id AA22549; Thu, 28 Jan 93 10:30:30 EST
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 10:30:30 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Michael Davis <mad@spirit.clearpoint.com>
Message-Id: <9301281530.AA22549@spirit.clearpoint.com>
To: criteria@ftp.com
Cc: brian@dxcern.cern.ch
In-Reply-To: Brian Carpenter CERN-CN's message of Thu, 28 Jan 93 8:17:43 MET <9301280717.AA22645@dxcern.cern.ch>
Subject: What real users want most

Brian,

I certainly do not presume to dismiss this information, nor paternally
pronounce on what they "really" want.  I do have a question, though.
How did the discussion go after that point.  Was the gist of their
desire "keep all the good stuff of IPv4 and *ADD* security"?  Do they
want security with tradeoffs in other areas, if necessary?

Or do they want it all? :^)

Just curious.

Mike Davis
Clearpoint Research Corp.


Brian Carpenter CERN-CN <brian@dxcern.cern.ch> wrote:

Brian> I was at a network users conference in England last week
Brian> and had lunch at a table full of pharmaceutical industry
Brian> network managers, all running IP. Firstly they basically were
Brian> unaware of the IPv7 discussion. Secondly when asked what was
Brian> their single top criterion for the replacement for IP, without
Brian> any prompting or discussion, they said (all of them) "security".
Brian> I just thought you'd like to know...

Brian> Regards,

Brian> 	Brian Carpenter CERN, brian@dxcern.cern.ch
Brian> 			voice +41 22 767 4967, fax +41 22 767 7155