IETF Logo Mail Archive

IPv7 Selection Criteria

yakov@watson.ibm.com Mon, 28 December 1992 17:07 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15404; 28 Dec 92 12:07 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15398; 28 Dec 92 12:07 EST
Received: from babyoil.ftp.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08354; 28 Dec 92 12:10 EST
Received: from watson.ibm.com by ftp.com with SMTP id AA24897; Mon, 28 Dec 92 12:04:41 -0500
Message-Id: <9212281704.AA24897@ftp.com>
Received: from YKTVMV by watson.ibm.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 7165; Mon, 28 Dec 92 12:04:22 EST
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 12:04:12 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: yakov@watson.ibm.com
To: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu, criteria@ftp.com, ericf@atc.boeing.com, jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu, kasten@ftp.com
Subject: IPv7 Selection Criteria

Ref:  Your note of Mon, 28 Dec 92 11:36:29 -0500


>.. if everyone wants the "august" IAB/IESG/whatever to make a pronouncement,
>or whehter people want some more broadly based decision (e.g. the market).

Noel,

I would think that a pronouncement by the "august" IAB/IESG/whatever
that *reflects* broadly based decision (e.g. market) is yet another
alternative that should be considered. This alternative seems much
more sane and sound than just "a pronouncement".

Yakov.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email