IETF Logo Mail Archive

question

yakov@watson.ibm.com Tue, 26 January 1993 21:42 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10398; 26 Jan 93 16:42 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10392; 26 Jan 93 16:42 EST
Received: from babyoil.ftp.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26640; 26 Jan 93 16:44 EST
Received: from watson.ibm.com by ftp.com with SMTP id AA18242; Tue, 26 Jan 93 16:39:44 -0500
Message-Id: <9301262139.AA18242@ftp.com>
Received: from YKTVMV by watson.ibm.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 6943; Tue, 26 Jan 93 16:39:29 EST
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 16:38:15 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: yakov@watson.ibm.com
To: solensky@andr.ub.com, criteria@ftp.com, tli@cisco.com
Subject: question

Ref:  Your note of Tue, 26 Jan 93 15:44:45 EST

>Gut feel si that the incremental cost to add SIP is much less than
>what it would be to add CLNP/TUBA or PIP

Frank,

What portion of the total cost of modifying host (either for SIP or for TUBA)
would be in the items above the Network Layer (e.g. applications) ?

Yakov

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email